A High School Student Reviews a Smartpen, the Livescribe Echo

August 19, 2010, 1:29 PM


Each summer, I’m joined by a summer intern, a high school or college student who, for some reason, has become fascinated by the inner workings of a tech critic’s life. This year, it was high school senior Matt Gibstein, who hails from Miami and made my life a lot easier this summer.

Back in 2008, I reviewed the Livescribe Pulse “smartpen”. When you write on special paper, the pen memorizes what you’ve written and simultaneously records the audio. Later, you can tap your notes on the page and hear, played back, the lecturer or interview subject who was speaking at the time.

Now there is a new version, called Echo. Since students make up a critical portion of the pen’s target audience, I figured Matt would be the perfect person to review it. Here is his write-up.

The Livescribe Echo smartpen.

As a student, I’ve been looking for some new technology that will change the note-taking process. There have been a few attempts: the tablet computer (bulky, easily misplaced special pen, poor battery life). There is the iPad (typing on glass can be tough—and while you can buy a special stylus, they’re too imprecise for handwriting). And then there is the laptop, the tool of every college student (useful, but a bother to carry around).

Like its predecessor, the Pulse smartpen, the Echo smartpen ($170 for 4 gigabytes of storage and $200 for 8 gigabytes) is a truly exciting product and it is designed almost exclusively for the student.

The device includes two ink cartridges, two pen caps, a micro USB cable, and a 50-sheet starter notebook.

The setup is simple. You indicate whether you’re right- or left-handed. Then you adjust the date and time by selecting buttons on a setup card with your pen tip. For example, to set the time to 8:28 p.m., I just tapped on the individual numbers 0-8-2-8 and then continued to tap on PM. The proper time appears on the skinny OLED screen on the side of the pen.

The Echo pen is not a radical departure from the Pulse, its predecessor. It is sleeker and slimmer. It is obviously a bit heftier than your average 99-cent ballpoint pen, but it is not too unwieldy. The updated pen also replaces the metal surface of the Pulse with a soft rubber grip.

To take notes, you write with real ink on the special paper, which is covered with barely visible dots; they tell the pen’s camera where you are on the page. (You can buy various pads of preprinted paper or you can print your own speckled paper at home.) Once you’re done, you’ll have the option to upload your notes to the computer.

The Paper Replay function lets you record a lecture while taking notes at the same time. The finished product is affectionately called a pencast. When you’re listening to a pencast, you can select a word by tapping on it in your notes. Then, the pen plays back whatever audio it recorded at that point in your writing.

You can share these pencasts with other people using the Livescribe Web site and desktop software. The app is free, so anyone with a computer can watch.

Yes, watch. Viewing a pencast is a unique experience indeed. You see your handwriting appear on the computer screen in front of you as the audio plays back.

One virtue of the smartpen is that it doesn’t serve as a distraction. Look, I’m a teenager. A laptop makes it incredibly easy to mask that you’re playing a game during a lecture or perusing Facebook. Once you mute the volume and start typing, most teachers assume that you’re vigorously taking notes. With the Echo smartpen, it is a lot more difficult to fool around.

There are some other drawbacks. At the moment, there are only about 75 apps available—hangman, Mastermind, Sudoku and a tip calculator among them. (The pen actually recognizes what you’re drawing—a Sudoku grid, for example.) Most of the apps are very simple and most cost money. It was annoying to learn that after shelling out $200 for the pen, I’d have to drop up to $15 (the price of the American Heritage Dictionary app) on other proprietary applications.

Another disappointment is that the apps are bulky. The more affordable 4-gigabyte Echo pen can only hold 400 hours of audio. While that seems like a lot if you are just taking notes, apps eat up the recording space. Larger apps like the English or Spanish dictionaries are the equivalent of 50 hours’ worth of audio. Assuming you take eight hours of notes a day with audio, the pen won’t even last you to midterms. Of course, you can use the Livescribe Desktop software to manage, save and then delete audio and pages off of the smartpen, but that’s a task that I honestly only want to do once a semester.

Over all, the Echo smartpen is a brilliant piece of technology—it will change the way I take notes, share notes with my classmates, and even study for tests. If Livescribe can shave a few bucks off the price tag, it will have a killer product on its hands

Q&A: Rumors, Cyberbullying and Anonymity

July 22, 2010, 4:31 PM


JohnJohn Palfrey

Last week in this space, I shared excerpts from an interview with David Mikkelson, half of the husband-and-wife team behind Snopes.com, the online clearinghouse for Internet rumors and urban legends. It was part of a “CBS News Sunday Morning” segment about online rumors that won’t ultimately air.

So I thought this week I’d share with you a piece of another interview for that segment. This time, the subject is John Palfrey, Harvard Law School professor, co-director of Harvard’s Berkman Center for Internet & Society, and author of “Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives.”

David Pogue: What experience do you bring to the Internet rumors issue?

John Palfrey: I study, in particular, how young people use technology, how they relate to one another. And one of the big things is they’ve moved their social lives, by and large, online. Places like Facebook and on services like Twitter, they’re spreading a lot of information, including rumors about one another.

DP: How does the Internet make rumor different than it was pre-Internet?

JP: I think it’s somewhat more explosive to spread a rumor on the Internet. Because it spreads so quickly, and the scale, the scope of it can be much greater. One of the things you hear from people who have been the victim of a malicious rumor is that the hurt is more, because so many people could have seen it so quickly and it’s so hard to respond to it.

DP: Is it that more people DO see it, or that when you read a rumor about yourself or your company you WORRY that more people can see it?

JP: It’s a combination of the two. In reality, as more and more social life for grown-ups and kids alike is going online, more people are seeing information in this format. But I think there’s also the sense from the person who’s being harmed by it that, oh my God, any one of over a billion people could have seen this thing about me and it’s so embarrassing.

DP: You sound as though you’re talking more about kids bullying and stuff like that. Or is everything you’ve said so far applicable to companies and –

JP: I think these are general statements about anyone. Rumors can be spread by kids about other kids in a cyberbullying context. Rumors certainly are spread about companies which damage their identity and their brand and their image. They’re certainly spread about politicians. They’re even written about columnists.

DP: (LAUGHS) No!

JP: Never!

DP: Is there a certain type of rumor that catches on more easily on the Internet? Like, if I wanted to start one, are there certain buttons I should push?

JP: The more salacious, the better. The more believable, and yet something that’s a little bit edgy.

DP: Do kids today have a keen sense of what’s credible?

JP: There’s a really broad range in the kids that we’ve interviewed, from the more sophisticated to the most gullible. And I think this is just like life in the offline world, where there are some people that believe virtually nothing on the Internet, and others who will believe anything they read. I think we’re seeing that same range play out here. It’s an important public issue in schools to make sure the kids are as digitally literate as they are in the offline world, too.

DP: Right. I just don’t know how much emphasis is being put on how kids should filter, process and learn to judge what they read.

JP: I think almost no emphasis is being put on giving kids the skills that they need to sort credible from noncredible information. Schools have to wake up and have to give those skills to our kids. It’s the critical thinking skill of the 21st century that they’re going to need, sorting credible from not credible information. And I think we’re asleep at the switch.

DP: I agree. Let’s rise up.

JP: There we go. Right.

DP: What would a syllabus be for a course on Internet credibility?

JP: I would use Wikipedia. I think it’s a fabulous, fabulous place to turn. Because some of the information is absolutely credible and really useful.

I look after the page about Alexander Hamilton. I think it’s a fabulous encyclopedia entry. You can learn much more about Hamilton’s life on that page than on any other encyclopedia entry. But there are lots of stories where people have introduced lots of false information through Wikipedia and it remains there.

So I think that the skill of figuring out which Wikipedia entry is more or less credible and figuring out how to use the History tab in Wikipedia. How do you look at the discussions that have played out there? How do you figure out about who the sources are who have written things? I think that could be a great syllabus in and of itself.

DP: So many of the things that are wrong with the Internet have to do with anonymity. What would be wrong with everyone being attached to their own names everywhere they go on the Internet?

JP: I think it’d be great if more people were more accountable about how they lead their lives online. And if people, in fact, used their real names more frequently.

Facebook has an advantage, for instance, over some other social networks because people tend more likely to be themselves. But the fear around anonymity is that there are places in the world where it’s very important. People are able to be anonymous and to say things about their government, for instance, without the likelihood that they’re going to be put in jail the next day. But I think in everyday life, for kids dealing with one another, or grown-ups dealing with one another, or corporations dealing with one another, we should be much more accountable and we should use our real names.

DP: Can you tell me what cyberbullying is and give me an example of it?

JP: Cyberbullying is when kids treat one another awfully online, when they hurt one another psychologically. So an example might be going onto Facebook and saying something cruel about one of your peers on their Web pages, their Facebook page. It might be going on MySpace and posting something there. It might be spreading something on a service like Twitter. It’s the act of bullying, only doing it online.

DP: Is the host of the service at all responsible? Does Facebook have any responsibility to take off hate speech?

JP: The host is not liable at all. This is part of federal law and it lets off the hook anyone who is a mere conduit of this information. And this is one of the big debates in the law. Is a site like Craigslist, for instance, responsible for things that are posted on Craigslist? And the basic answer is no.

DP: So this has been tested in court?

JP: It’s been tested hundreds of times in court. It’s the Communications Decency Act, Section 230. And it’s been held up consistently.

DP: Is cyberbullying part of Internet rumors?

JP: Very much part of it. If we look at what are the harms that are happening to kids online, the most common harm is psychological harm.

Sometimes it’s a rumor that happens to be true, and those are often the ones that hurt the most. So it’s not only that people are starting false rumors, but it’s the extent to which young people are playing out their relationships online—sometimes relationships that probably should have been kept offline.

DP: How widespread is this?

JP: Extraordinarily widespread. So if you were to ask young people about the most likely harm that they’re going to have experienced, it’s almost invariably bullying online that they tell you.

DP: Is there anything to be done? I mean, my kids get told, “Don’t cyberbully,” but does it do any good?

JP: It’s awfully hard. I think your note about wanting kids to be more accountable for who they are, not to hide behind anonymity when they’re dealing with one another, is very important. But we should not pass a law against cyberbullying.

DP: We shouldn’t?

JP: No. No.

DP: Why not?

JP: Well, there’s a bill pending before Congress, the Megan Meier Cyberbullying Act, which would criminalize the amount of human-to-human interaction on the Web. I think we don’t want to fill our jails with teenagers who are trying to figure out how to deal with one another.

DP: Have you ever been the victim of a blog attack or a rumor?

JP: Nothing too nasty. But everyone will start now that I’m doing this. (LAUGHS)

Rapid Innovation: The Philosophy of Betaworks Founder John Borthwick

Continuing our series on product innovation and the people driving it, this week I spoke with the founder of Betaworks: John Borthwick. If you're unfamiliar with the name Betaworks, you will recognize the products under its umbrella: Bit.ly (the leading link shortener), TweetDeck (desktop Twitter client), Chartbeat (real-time analytics service) and SocialFlow (a social messaging service). As well as growing companies, Betaworks is a seed-stage investor in a range of real-time web companies - such as Tumblr, Twitterfeed, Superfeedr and Songkick.

In this two-part post, we give an overview of John Borthwick's product development philosophy. Then in part 2, to be published tomorrow, we will outline the evolution of one of Betaworks' products: Chartbeat.

How Betaworks Began

John Borthwick started Betaworks about two and half years ago. He had "a view of social distribution and the real-time web and how that was changing the way people navigate stuff online." The Web had evolved and there was "a new set of metaphors and tools."

Borthwick believed that increasingly people were using a loosely-coupled set of tools in order to construct their experiences online. "What's connecting those tools," he told me, "is sometimes identity, but often just data. And people want to be able to port that data across multiple tools." A much different model to the 'walled garden' web portals of about 8 years ago.

Betaworks is building products that plug in to different services.

"Our model is one where there's best of breed services that are loosely coupled and connected by data."

Borthwick's Philosophy of Product Development

"Innovation is changing," John Borthwick told me. "The costs of starting a company are falling at an incredible pace. Matched with that is that the cost of scaling a company is dropping."

How Betaworks works is by providing a platform "to help rapidly iterate and innovate in the early stage of a company, so [that] we can be fairly aggressive about instrumenting products." Using this method, which Borthwick calls "rapid innovation," Betaworks knows when a product is taking off .

"Or we know when to take it out back and shoot it."

This approach also applies to the scaling of a product. "When things start to scale," said Borthwick, "we scale them fairly cheaply and fairly fast."

The first product at Betaworks was called Findings. Borthwick told me that it shipped it as an alpha product, but it wasn't a success so "we took it out back and shot it." However, Betaworks then iterated Findings into something else: Bit.ly.

Incidentally, Borthwick noted that Betaworks is back working on Findings again - but he declined to discuss further.

"This process of rapid innovation and the inception phase of a product and its elements, is intrical to our view of the world. So the first thing we worked on we actually killed. But out of that grew, indirectly, Bit.ly. We needed to create a link shortener. At the same time we were working on another product, called Firefly. And out of Firefly grew Chartbeat."

We'll discuss the development process of Chartbeat in Part 2 of this post.

Products & Trends That Borthwick is Watching

During this series I'm asking all of the interview subjects what products (other than their own) they're excited about and what trends they're monitoring.

John Borthwick likes an iPad app called Camera A. When used with an iPhone app called Camera B, it connects your iPad and iPhone together by bluetooth or wifi - allowing you to take photos using iphone. Or it can be used as a baby monitoring device. Borthwick said that it re-defines boundaries for what the iPad is (as it doesn't have camera). He also mentioned an iphone app called You gotta see this!, which pans around a room and "stitches together a panoramic view."

As for trends that Borthwick is monitoring, he is still intensely interested in the real-time web. He sees it as a "10 year game changer" and said that its impact on mobile and ipad will be significant. "There are a lot of interesting things happening in real-time iPad apps," he remarked.

Borthwick also sees tools of social distribution becoming more mobile. He thinks there is a lot of opportunity in that market.

Finally, he is watching what is happening with the closed vs. open web - which he calls the "potential balkanization of the web." Pieces of that is happening with app stores, Facebook and Twitter, he said. "Everything we're building here is predicated on an open web architecture," concluded Borthwick.

Join us for Part 2 of this interview tomorrow, when we delve into the product development process behind Chartbeat. In the meantime, let us know your thoughts on Borthwick's product innovation philosophy in the comments.

Snaptu: Can’t Code? No Problem. Come To The Hackathon Demos This Sunday

"This Saturday, hundreds of hackers, designers, and entrepreneurs are going to descend upon the San Francisco Design Center Concourse for the..."


Click here to read the full story

--
This email was sent to you from Snaptu mobile application.

Snaptu: How and Why Chrome Is Overtaking Firefox Among Power Users [Video]

"Firefox has long been the go-to web browser among power users for its impressive feature set, extensibility, and openness. But Google's nimble, light,..."


Click here to read the full story

--
This email was sent to you from Snaptu mobile application.

Start BitTorrent downloads remotely with Dropbox


Here’s a quick way to start BitTorrent downloads remotely, if you’re usingDropbox. First, make sure Dropbox is installed in the computer where you regularly download your torrents, probably your main computer at home. For those not using Dropbox, you can get an account here. You’ll have to download a small application, which creates a “Dropbox” folder in your “My Documents” folder in Windows or in your “Home” folder in OS X. Dropbox keeps that folder synchronized across all the computers where you have installed it, so that if you move a file into that folder, it will show up on all the other computers. You can also access and upload files via Dropbox’s web interface.

Now, most BitTorrent clients have an option to automatically add torrents copied on a certain folder. In Transmission, it’s in preferences, in the “transfers” tab. Check the Watch for torrent files in option. Optionally, check the Trash original torrent files so your folder doesn’t fill up with old .torrent files.

Transmission preferences

In µTorrent, the option is in the preferences (the cog icon in the toolbar), under “directories.” Check Automatically load .torrents from and optionally, Delete loaded .torrents.

Transmission preferences

What you want to do is set those options to watch your Dropbox folder (or a folder inside your Dropbox, if you want to keep things tidy) for new.torrents, so they’ll start downloading automatically when a new file appears. Do not, however, set your client to save the resulting download into your Dropbox folder. Save them elsewhere.

Now as long as you keep Dropbox and BitTorrent running, you can start torrents remotely. All you have to do is upload .torrent files to the Dropbox folder from wherever you are, using the web interface, and it should start downloading almost immediately on the other computer. I started doing this at the office, because for some reason I can’t use Transmission’s web UI from there, and it’s worked for me without a hitch; by the time I get home, my downloads are usually ready. Give it a shot, and let me know what you think.

Bonus: Move your files and start Transmission with Automator

When I first wrote this last year, I forgot two critical issues. First, if I tell my computer to watch my Dropbox for torrent files, it means that when I’m at home I’ll have to move the torrent files there myself, or start the downloads manually, because by default they’re saved to the Downloads folder. That’s annoying. And second, if Transmission is not running, then saving the torrent files to Dropbox is not going to be of much help. Well, you can solve both problems in Mac OS X 10.6 with a couple of Automator folder actions.

  1. Open Automator. In the initial “choose a template for your workflow” dialog, select “folder action”.
  2. In the “Folder Action receives files and folders added to” dropdown at the top of the window, select your Downloads folder, or the folder where you have set your browser to save your downloaded files.
  3. In the actions library to the left, select “Files & Folders” and add a “Filter Finder Items” action. Set the conditions to “file extension” “is” “torrent”.
  4. Add a “Move Finder Items” action. Set it to move the files to the folder in your Dropbox you told your BitTorrent client to watch.
  5. From “Utilities”, add a “Launch Application” action, and tell it to launch Transmission, or whatever BitTorrent app you use.
  6. Save your workflow.

Your workflow should look like this:

When you download a torrent file locally, it will automatically move it to Dropbox, where Transmission will catch it and start the download. That takes care of the case where you download the torrent locally, but you need a second automator action to start Transmission when you add a torrent to Dropbox remotely:

  1. Create another Automator workflow. Again, make it a Folder Action, but this time tell it to watch the second folder, the one inside Dropbox where you’re moving the torrent files.
  2. In the actions library to the left, select “Files & Folders” and add a “Filter Finder Items” action. Set the conditions to “file extension” “is” “torrent”.
  3. From “Utilities”, add a “Launch Application” action, and tell it to launch Transmission, or whatever BitTorrent app you use.
  4. Save the workflow.

Boom. Done. Now, when a torrent file appears in your Dropbox, either because you uploaded it remotely or because the first Automator folder action moved it from the Downloads folder, your BitTorrent app will automatically launch and start the downloa

Start BitTorrent Downloads at Home from Any Computer with Dropbox


Blogger Guillermo Esteves loves his BitTorrent, so when he's away from his home computer, he still wants to start up any download at a moment's notice. His solution: Use file-syncing application Dropbox to sync torrents between computers.

Assuming you've got Dropbox installed on your home computer and work computer, for example, you can download a torrent, save it to your Dropbox folder, and let Dropbox sync that new torrent to your home computer.

Using the folder monitoring feature available in most popular BitTorrent applications (including uTorrent for Windows/Mac and Transmission for Mac/Linux), your BitTorrent app of choice can monitor your Dropbox folder for new torrent files and automatically open them when they appear. In practice, that translates to dead simple, instant remote BitTorrent downloads, which we like very much.

You can also upload torrent files to Dropbox from the Dropbox web interface, so you could even do this from a computer where you can't install Dropbox. This isn't the only remote BitTorrent method out there, but it's certainly a good (and easy to implement)

What if the internet fell over tomorrow?


June 28, 2010 - 8:23AM


SO US Senator Joe Lieberman has proposed a bill to create an internet ‘‘kill switch’’ that would enable the US president to shut down the web in a time of threat or crisis.

Putting aside whether this is possible — some IT experts say the internet is so decentralised it can’t be brought down; others say it would be rendered pretty much useless if the president ordered ISPs and domain name servers across the country to pull the plug — what would an internet-free world feel like?

I had a brief taste this week. It wasn’t pleasant.

It started with the two-hours-plus lockdown of Melbourne’s train system on Monday. The halt to services was inconvenient but understandable — you don’t muck around when there’s a gunman on the loose near a busy transport hub like Richmond station.

When the train driver first announced a 15-minute delay at Toorak station due to a ‘‘police action’’ on the line I emailed a heads-up about train delays to our newsdesk. I sent another 40 minutes later when the driver announced that police were hunting a gunman and could not say when services would resume.

Before I could open a browser to do a news search on what was happening, disaster: my phone died. Curse the iPhone’s short battery life.

So I fired up the iPad — just in time to see the last of its juice trickle away. Curse my decision to recharge the thing when I got to the office instead of at home.

When the announcement of the shutdown finally came, after more than an hour, I had to find another way to get to the city in time to do an interview.

Toorak is not The Bronx, but it’s foreign territory to me. All the cabs in the area had been absorbed by foiled-commuter demand and without Google Maps I had no idea in which direction the city lay.

OK, I could have asked someone, or climbed a hill, or used some basic Boy Scout skills to find north-west-ish, but by this time I was playing ‘‘Can I survive a crisis situation without the internet?’’

I had no means of communication with the world beyond the immediate reach of my senses; no information other than what I carried in my head (‘‘Hello in there there there there ...’’); no food, water, flares or other way to attract the attention of a search party.

It was all a bit scary, so I gave up the game when I spotted a tram arriving at a stop overflowing with briefcased commuter types. Taking a punt they were city-bound, I squeezed on with them. An hour later I was at my desk and reconnected with the world.

In the end the event was just a minor annoyance but it was enough to get me thinking. The net has become so intricately woven through so many parts of our lives, what would be the longer term fallout-out if it went for good?

There would be serious immediate ramifications of the kind predicted when the Y2K ‘‘disaster’’ threatened: aeroplanes would fall from the sky, financial systems would collapse, failed traffic and transport systems would cause chaos in cities around the world.

But a decade later — with the explosion of social media and online databases and other services — the impact would go far beyond the technological.

What follows is a brief list of some of the ramifications. Some come from websites that have discussed what a world without the internet might be like, some are my own.

* Families and friends would enjoy more face time
* It would be harder to cheat at Trivia Night without internet-capable smartphones
* The newspaper business model would look good again
* Libraries would be filled with schoolkids and journalists denied Wikipedia’s instant find-a-fact service
* People would spend hours creating their own mix tapes instead of relying on iTunes’ Genius function
* School bullies would have to eyeball their victims
* Shops would have to rediscover personal service — and stop overcharging for P&H
* Conspiracy theorists and other crackpots would be booted from the mainstream back to the fringes where they belong
* Huge queues would form outside XXX establishments
* We’d have to wait months for local networks to screen episodes of our favourite overseas TV shows — if we got to see them at all
* Demand for bookshelf makers would surge
* Board games would be played in the presence of the people playing them
* Attention spans and short-term memory would increase
* We’d lose the sense of urgency and expectation that everything has to be done three seconds ago
* Attention spans and short-term memory would increase

Feel free to add your own suggestions in the Comments section.

Addendum: Cracked.com held a Photoshop competition last year titled ‘‘The World of Tomorrow (If The Internet Disappeared Today)’’. The responses were brilliant. Check them out here.

blog: internet kill switch?
So Senator Joe Lieberman has proposed a bill in the US to create an internet ‘‘kill switch’’, enabling the US president to shut down the web in a time of threat or crisis.
Putting aside whether this is possible — some IT experts say the internet is so decentralised it can’t be brought down; others say it would be rendered pretty much useless if the president ordered ISPs and domain name servers across the country to pull the plug — what would an internet-free world feel like?
I had a brief taste this week. It wasn’t pleasant.
It started with the two-hours-plus lockdown of Melbourne’s train system on Monday.
The halt to services was inconvenient but understandable — you don’t muck around when there’s a gunman on the loose near a busy transport hub like Richmond station.
When the train driver first announced a 15-minute delay at Toorak station due to a ‘‘police action’’ on the line I emailed a heads-up about train delays to our newsdesk. I sent another 40 minutes later when the driver announced that police were hunting a gunman and could not say when services would resume.
Before I could open a browser to do a news search on what was happening, disaster: my phone died. Curse the iPhone’s short battery life.
So I fired up the iPad — just in time to see the last of its juice trickle away. Curse my decision to recharge the thing when I got to the office instead of at home.
When the announcement of the shutdown finally came, after more than an hour, I had to find another way to get to the city in time to do an interview.
Toorak is not The Bronx, but it’s foreign territory to me. All the cabs in the area had been absorbed by foiled-commuter demand and without Google Maps I had no idea in which direction the city lay.
OK, I could have asked someone, or climbed a hill, or used some basic Boy Scout skills to find north-west-ish, but by this time I was playing ‘‘Can I survive a crisis situation without the internet?’’
So, no means of communication with the world beyond the immediate reach of my senses; no information other than what I carried in my head (‘‘Hello in there there there there ...’’); no food, water, flares or other way to attract the attention of a search party.
I gave up the game when I spotted a tram arriving at a stop overflowing with briefcased commuter types. I took a punt they were city-bound and squeezed on with them. An hour later I was at my desk and reconnected with the world.
In the end the event was just a minor annoyance but it was enough to get me thinking. The net has become so intricately woven through so many parts of our lives, what would be the longer term fallout-out if it went for good?
There would be serious immediate ramifications of the kind predicted when the Y2K ‘‘disaster’’ threatened: aeroplanes would fall from the sky, financial systems would collapse, failed traffic and transport systems would cause chaos in cities around the world.
But a decade later — with the explosion of social media and online databases and other services — the impact would go far beyond the technological.
What follows is a brief list of some of the ramifications. Some come from websites that have discussed what a world without the internet might be like, some are my own.
* Families and friends would enjoy more face time
* It would be harder to cheat at Trivia Night without internet-capable smartphones
* The newspaper business model would look good again
* Libraries would be filled with schoolkids and journalists denied Wikipedia’s instant find-a-fact service
* People would spend hours creating their own mix tapes instead of relying on iTunes’ Genius function
* School bullies would have to eyeball their victims
* Shops would have to rediscover personal service — and stop overcharging for P&H
* Conspiracy theorists and other crackpots would be booted from the mainstream back to the fringes where they belong
* Huge queues would form outside XXX establishments
* We’d have to wait months for local networks to screen episodes of our favourite overseas TV shows — if we got to see them at all
* Demand for bookshelf makers would surge
* Board games would be played in the presence of the people playing them
* Attention spans and short-term memory would increase
* We’d lose the sense of urgency and expectation that everything has to be done three seconds ago
* Attention spans and short-term memory would increase
Feel free to add suggestions in the Comments section.
Addendum: Cracked.com held a Photoshop competition last year titled ‘‘The World of Tomorrow (If The Internet Disappeared Today)’’. The responses were brilliant. Check them out here.
(http://www.cracked.com/photoshop_90_the-world-tomorrow-if-internet-disappeared-today_p20#1)

This story was found at: http://www.watoday.com.au/technology/blogs/untangling-the-web/what-if-the-internet-fell-over-tomorrow/20100624-z2fl.html

Compare: instant messaging


Adam Turner
October 15, 2009 - 10:00AM

Having a quick chat to a friend online has never been easier, writes Adam Turner.

If you're looking for a simple way to swap messages with friends quickly, it doesn't get much easier than instant messaging.

Instant messaging is the online equivalent of SMS, letting you send short text messages to your friends that pop up on their screen in a chat box. You create a contact list of friends, often called a buddy list, which shows their "status" — whether they're available to chat or offline.

Clicking a friend in a buddy list opens a window in which you can type a message. Hit return and your message pops up on your friend's screen, letting you swap messages in real time — making it cheaper than a call or text and faster than email. You can also bring in other friends to create a group chat.

While instant messaging started as a basic text-only service, several of the instant messaging services have added voice and video chat.

While you can download instant messaging software to your Mac or PC, most of the main instant messaging providers also offer versions that run in a web browser. Three of today's most popular instant messaging services are run by the three major search and webmail providers — Microsoft, Yahoo! and Google. Their instant messaging software can add your email address book to your buddy list and alert you of incoming emails. Some also offer tabbed chat, similar to tabbed browsing, which opens new chat sessions in a new tab rather than a new window — so your screen doesn't fill up with chat windows.

Of course not all your friends necessarily use the same IM service and you might not want several applications running in the background. Yahoo! and Microsoft have struck a deal to allow their instant messaging users to talk to each other, while Yahoo! and Google have also announced plans for interoperability. Unfortunately, such cross-platform services are still limited.

The next battleground between instant messaging services is integration with third-party social networking sites, such as Twitter.

INSTANT MESSAGING — THE CONTENDERS

Yahoo! Messenger 9.0
au.messenger.yahoo.com
Rating: 4/5

Yahoo! Messenger is the most flexible when it comes to social interaction. It lets you create a "Pingbox", embedded in your social network profile, blog or website, which is a simple chat box that lets visitors interact with you when you're signed into Yahoo! Messenger. If you create a Yahoo! profile, you can link it to services such as Twitter, YouTube and Last.fm so friends can monitor your status. It also lets you see your friends' status alongside their names in your Yahoo! Messenger buddy list, such as their most recent Twitter post. You can also easily upload images to the Flickr photo sharing site. Yahoo! Messenger's other great feature is that it lets you split your buddy list into categories and set a different status for each, so you can appear offline to work colleagues in the evenings while appearing online to your family and friends.

Windows Live Messenger 2009
download.live.com
Rating: 3.5/5

Windows Live Messenger (WLM) has also embraced social networking, offering access to an impressive range of services including Facebook, Flickr, Twitter, WordPress, Last.fm, Photobucket and Digg, as well as Microsoft's family of services. There's a new ticker on the bottom of the WLM interface that displays social networking updates from your friends. Thankfully, you've got control over which services you want to add to your WLM profile and which services you want to see in the profiles of your friends. Unfortunately, you can't alter this on a per friend basis, so, for example, if you enable Facebook, you have to suffer through the Facebook updates from all your friends — whereas the actual Facebook site gives you more granular control.

Google Talk
google.com/talk
Rating: 2.5/5

Google Talk is a lot more basic than the other two applications, although you can make Twitter posts by adding twitter@twitter.com to your buddy list. If you use the Google Latitude GPS service with your mobile phone, you can set it to update your location on Google Talk automatically. Google Talk integrates with Google's Orkut social networking service, which is still rough around the edges compared with Facebook. One of Google Talk's strengths is that pop-up email notifications reveal the sender, subject and a message preview (WLM only displays the sender, Yahoo! Messenger displays the sender and subject).

The Verdict

Yahoo! Messenger's integration with WLM, and eventually Google Talk, make it the most appealing to those with a wide circle of friends. The ability to alter your status for different groups on your buddy list could be a godsend for those who have been forced to use multiple accounts in an effort to separate their professional and private lives. If you're a social networking junkie then you might be tempted by WLM's access to a wider range of services.

This story was found at: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/digital-life/digital-life-news/compare-instant-messaging-20091014-gw6q.html

Want eternal life? It could be possible in the Internet of Things

July 23, 2010 - 8:29AM

WOULD you feel hurt if your refrigerator stopped returning your emails? Would you be annoyed to have your dinner interrupted by a pot plant demanding a drink? Are you friends with your toilet on Facebook?

Do you like the idea of a virtual avatar that contains your personality and memories — the essence of you — that could communicate with your descendants?

It's only a matter of time.

Treating machines as though they're human might sound like a stretch but Web 2.0 , the social web — the internet in which everyone is a content producer and everyone is connected — is creating a new relationship between people and technology.

Welcome to The Internet of Things.

The Internet of Things is a web in which gadgets, machines, everyday products, devices and inanimate objects share information about themselves in new ways, in real time.

Using a range of technologies — such as embedded radio frequency identification (RFID) chips linked with IP addresses (internet signatures), near-field communications, electronic product codes and GPS systems — just about anything can be connected to a network. The connected objects can then be tracked and output information can be recorded, analysed and shared in countless ways via the internet — some productive, some frivolous, some a little unnerving.

Some examples:

* A range of toilets developed in Japan can analyse your stool, body fat, blood pressure, heart rate, urine sugar levels, albumin and blood in urine and send the results to your GP to flag potential health issues. Hiroyuki Matsui, chief engineer at high-end Japanese toilet manufacturer Matsushita calls the toilets ''health measuring centres''.

* US Courier company FedEx has plans for a sensor to track in real time a package's position and record details such as whether it has been opened and whether it is too hot or cold

* Fridges are being developed that monitor their contents, including the health values and use-by dates of various foods and whether you need to buy more milk

* The Botanicalls system enables a plant to broadcast its moisture level and text, phone or tweet when it needs to be watered

* A networked bathroom scale developed by BodyTrace, launched last year, wirelessly uploads a user's information to a website, calculates weight and BMI charts, and offers dietary recommendations

* Beef farmers in Japan have IP addresses embedded on RFID chips implanted in the skin of cattle to track them through the production process

* Puppy Tweets, a dog collar designed by toy-maker Mattel, tweets random messages from your pet (example: ''I bark because I miss you. There, I said it. Now hurry home.'')

* London's iconic clock Big Ben marks time by tweeting ''BONG'' for every chime of the hour. The account has about 57,000 followers. (There's parody version, similarly named but ruder, that tweets DONG for every BONG. It has just 100 followers.)

Some of these are gimmicks, but they point to the technology's potential.

In a world in which every device is connected, monitored and able to communicate, the web becomes as much a part of our environment as air and sunlight. When data from those devices is cached, sorted and analysed, new relationships develop between humans and technology.

An example of this is Life Account, developed by a group of Mexican university students and the recent winner of Cisco's I-Prize.

Melding social media with the Internet of Things, Life Account uses ''smart'' objects to collect information about a person from both the physical and virtual worlds. The aggregated data is then pulled together into a avatar that reflects the habits and behaviours of the subject.

Life Account has mainly marketing applications for companies wanting to better target and deliver products to consumers. For example, tracking your online behaviour — Amazon searches, Facebook comments, photo-tagging activities and tweets — it could know that your partner has a birthday coming up and push tailored gift suggestions to you.

But similar avatar-development projects have a less commercial purpose. Lifenaut (see New Scientist, June 5 issue) aims to combine personal information collated through interviews and online behaviour to create a virtual replica of a person that would survive beyond their death and be able to interact with relatives and descendants. Creepy.

What information will there be to upload from the Internet of Things? You name it. As sensor devices such as smartphones and RFID tags proliferate, the web will be awash with every conceivable kind of information about us. There's already an enormous amount out there.

According to a February 2010 report by The Hammersmith Group (''The Internet of Things: Networked objects and devices''), there are currently about 1.5 billion internet capable computers and more than a billion smartphones. Within five years, says the report, there will be 100 billion devices connected to the internet, all generating enormous information trails.

Talking about the ''sensor revolution'' — the proliferation of mobile phone devices that can see (camera), hear (microphone) and feel (touch screen) the world around us — Google vice president Marissa Mayer has noted that in 2009 there was more than 280 exabytes of data online, 56 times more than in 2002. Riffing on the same theme, Hewlett Packard CEO Mark Hurd has said that more data will be created in the next four years than in the history of the planet.

Will you become friends with your toilet on Facebook in this brave new world?

Perhaps not. But in The Internet of Things, it might be a good idea to introduce it to your doctor — otherwise you might need that virtual avatar sooner than you'd like.


Twitter: untanglingweb

This story was found at: http://www.watoday.com.au/technology/blogs/untangling-the-web/want-eternal-life-it-could-be-possible-in-the-internet-of-things/20100722-10m1g.html

Talkin' 'bout the (digital) generation



July 30, 2010 - 10:19AM

Are digital natives really the alien species so many social media watchers suggest they are?

A French study into the habits of people born in the computer age — the 18-24-year-olds today permanently connected to a mouse, touchpad and/or smartphone — paints an unappealing portrait.

Conducted by polling company BV, the study (''GENE-TIC: Generation and Technology of Information and Communication'') identified several characteristics of this tech-savvy generation.

According to the survey, digital natives (aka ''millennials''):

* Treat life like a computer game When shopping, for example, they enjoy chasing down bargains and being better informed than the people they're buying from. They see brands as an enemy to be defeated.

* Distrust marketing Advertising — manipulation in general — is regarded with suspicion and contempt and is a quick way to alienate millennials. Connecting with this group is difficult for companies.

* Trust their immediate online social circle before all others Generally speaking, digital natives trust their friends and family most, then a group of about 20-30 peers, then a larger circle of 200 or so what could be termed ''Facebook friends'', which acts as an echo chamber for opinions and the sharing of information. Elusiveness and deceptiveness typifies digital natives' behaviour when dealing with those outside these circles.

* Rely on the group for information The millennials' news diet consists of small chunks, quickly delivered. Sound bites and fast grabs based on headlines, short news bulletins and free commuter newspapers — filtered into a hierarchy of importance and relevance as they are shared by the group — are preferred over in-depth journalism. Consequently, the authority of information depends on whether or not the group believes it. Collectively sourced and collated information is seen as more credible than traditional news sources. Wikipedia, for example, is seen as more trustworthy because it is crowd-sourced and so is seen as neutral.

Discussing the results of the survey in his Monday Note blog, French commentator on things digital Frederic Filloux (on whose work I've relied for the preceding precis of its findings) drew some tentative conclusions.

Filloux suggests that the ''top-down, our-way-or-the-highway'' structure of most workplaces needs to be reworked because digital natives don't respect authority and are willing to walk at a moment's notice. Essentially, they should be given a measure of freedom to get the most from their potential.

He argues that society's ruling elite — government, corporations — do not yet understand the central role and importance of ''the group'' to this digital generation. He suggests that a ''hostile disconnection'' between the group and the rest of society looms if this is not addressed.

Last, Filloux sees the group's attitude to information as having the potential to create a split in the ranks of news consumers. On one hand, he reckons, will be digital natives who are happy with superficial, easily absorbed dollops of information; on the other will be a news-consuming elite that relies on in-depth, balanced information. He warns of a threat to democracy from the rise of a poorly informed electorate.

Are these qualities really a function of being digital natives or merely of being young?

Pontificating about technology and its effects on society and human relations often assumes the creation of behaviours never before seen. That's usually rubbish. Technology magnifies existing human behaviours and tendencies.

OK, new social structures do arise when, say, technology makes connecting and sharing with others simpler and faster. But at our core we are social beings (thus the rise of social networking); crooks will try to dupe the gullible (hence Nigerian email scams); kids will continue to bully each other (at least when it's done online there's a record and the perpetrators can be easily collared); privacy is an issue both online and off.

The portrait of digital natives described in the BV survey is a similar magnification of existing behaviours.

The BV findings can be attributed in large part to the nature of youth. They find it hard to trust anyone outside their tightknit peer group; they're disrespectful, irreverent, reckless and mischievous by nature. Sometimes they are nasty and they occasionally go too far. Technology enables and exacerbates that but it doesn't create it.

But biographies are littered with tales of misspent youth, drug experimentation, driving too fast, making mistakes, testing boundaries, flying off the handle at the wrong time, uncontrolled hormones.

Let's wait to see whether this generation grows out of some of its in-built proclivities before pronouncing it a separate species, warped by technology.

The issue of how they choose what information to trust and what not to trust is a matter for further investigation. Hopefully we'll address that in this space next week.

This story was found at: http://www.watoday.com.au/technology/blogs/untangling-the-web/talkin-bout-the-digital-generation/20100730-10ywx.html

Snaptu: How to Detect a Photoshopped Image [Image Manipulation]

"Photoshop is an amazing tool for altering reality, but it's only really great when you're aware of its effects. Here are several tips for detecting a..."


Click here to read the full story

--
This email was sent to you from Snaptu mobile application.

Snaptu: How to Detect a Photoshopped Image [Image Manipulation]

"Photoshop is an amazing tool for altering reality, but it's only really great when you're aware of its effects. Here are several tips for detecting a..."


Click here to read the full story

--
This email was sent to you from Snaptu mobile application.

A Professor’s Review of Online Cheat Sheets


A Professor’s Review of Online Cheat Sheets

At this time of year, students are buying textbooks and looking for ways to avoid reading them.

Nothing is new about that. CliffsNotes guides, with their familiar yellow and black covers, have been in book bags since 1958.

What has changed is how many study guides, or cheat sheets, are available online and on mobile phones. Whether you know them as CliffsNotes, SparkNotes or Shmoop, these seemingly ubiquitous guides are now, in many cases, free.

“Two to three years ago, the wisdom was that students do research online, but not study online,” said Emily Sawtell, a founder of McGraw-Hill’s online collaborative study site called GradeGuru. “That has changed in the last 12 months.” Ms. Sawtell said she had tracked a significant increase in the search term “study guide” on Google.

Professors warn that these guides are no substitutes for reading great works of literature, but concede, grudgingly, that as an adjunct, they can stimulate thought and deepen insight.

“The problem is when you use a study guide in place of the original book,” said Cary Nelson, professor of English at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and president of the American Association of University Professors. “Then they have knowledge that is not just superficial, but wrong.”

Carl Fisher, chairman of the comparative world literature and classics department at California State University, Long Beach, agreed to review the many offerings, starting with the oldest. CliffsNotes guides cover not only literature, but also foreign languages, math, science, history and other topics, and many of the guides are free online.

In booklet form, 159 literature study guides are available, costing about $6 to $10 each. But more than 250 are available online, and all can be viewed free. Downloading them as PDF files costs $5 to $10 each. A comparatively paltry 39 CliffsNotes for literature are available for mobile at $1.99 each for the iPhone.

CliffsNotes, owned by Wiley Publishing, also offers free podcasts called CramCasts, which are three- to five-minute overviews of books with a plot summary.

“CliffsNotes is one of the most thorough, one of the most insightful,” Professor Fisher said. “If a student wanted to use it along with the text, it would be worthwhile.” He liked that, for some books, the complete text was included with the study guide on line. But CliffsNotes lost points for some dated writing. He looked at notes describing “Candide” in terms of Voltaire’s life and said: “No one does biographical criticism anymore. They haven’t since the 1970s.”

SparkNotes, which is owned by Barnes & Noble and began in 1999, is a newcomer compared with CliffsNotes, but it is well established with today’s students. It offers a library of 690 guides, including literature, math, history and biology, all free on the Web.

Most of the guides are available as e-books for Barnes & Noble’s electronic reader, the Nook, or any device that runs Nook software, which is available for BlackBerrys and iPhones, and handsets with Google’s Android operating system. The electronic editions of the guides and downloadable PDFs are $4.95. The No Fear Shakespeare series, which offers a modern translation next to the original texts, costs $4.99 for each guide. While those are not available as downloadable PDFs, they are available on iTunes for $4.99 each.

About 150 of the SparkNotes are still available in book form for $4.95 each, and the book form of No Fear Shakespeare costs $5.35.

Professor Fisher said SparkNotes’ analysis was more contemporary than that offered on some of the other sites. “It is a generally useful, more nuanced interpretation than the others. Of all the ones I looked at, I’d probably say SparkNotes is the best choice,” he said.

Shmoop, though, is the newcomer. It has been online for only 18 months. It has set itself apart from the stalwarts by synopsizing the expected canon, like Camus’s “The Stranger” and Shakespeare’s “Hamlet,” as well as by analyzing more contemporary and popular culture works. Among its 600 study guides are guides for best sellers like Stieg Larsson’s “The Girl Who Played With Fire” and song lyrics like Lady Gaga’s “Paparazzi,” which it likens to “The Great Gatsby,” “Cat on a Hot Tin Roof” and “Who’s Afraid ofVirginia Woolf.” Though Shmoop says the authors come “from Ph.D. and masters’ programs at Stanford, Harvard, U.C. Berkeley and other top universities” the site still misspelled the last name of Virginia Woolf, the English author. Guides on topics like civics and economics also are available.

All of the guides are free online. They are also available for 99 cents to $2.99 for the Sony Reader, Kindle and Nook e-readers and iPhone, Android and BlackBerry smartphones using the Nook reader app. Shmoop also sells PDF versions for $5. Study guides for Advanced Placement and college entrance exams are $10 to $25.

Dr. Fisher liked the idea behind Shmoop’s “Why Should I care?” section. It explains the satire in “Candide” by comparing it to modern satires like “The Simpsons” and “The Family Guy.” The problem, he said, is that the writing strains to relate to students. “It makes an interesting attempt to be hip,” he said, “but it is just so high school-y.”

GradeSaver boasts that a majority of its authors are Ivy League-educated. The site offers more than 400 guides covering literature, poetry and short stories, with two film guides. Professor Fisher said that the writing was among the best. “It is quite readable, if you can get around the blue jeans ads, which are right in the middle of the text.”

The site specializes in essays. It sells copies of 712 college essays that the site said landed the authors in top colleges. It says it also carries 2,715 literature essays. The essays are available through a subscription ranging from $3 for a three days (subscribers are automatically enrolled in the $7-a-month program unless they cancel), up to a one-time charge of $50 a year. GradeSaver has an editing service as well, with charges ranging from $8 a page for proofreading to $150 to edit an essay of a maximum of 1,000 words within 24 hours.

The site offers a forum site where students post opinions (on ”Call of the Wild:” “boring ... zzzzzz!”) and cries for help, (“I NEED HELP**ASAP**ON THE UTOPIAS IN CANDIDE”).

Some sites did not make the grade at all. The guides from PinkMonkey — __ which also incorporates notes from TheBestNotes.com and Barron’s Booknotes — were “the least thoughtful, the least insightful and the most disjointed,” Dr. Fisher said.

BookRags, offered only partial summaries free, and Professor Fisher said what he found there was too elementary. “BookRags is for really desperate people,” he said. “It’s simplistic and it forces people to pay up front.” He found the quality of the writing on Bookwolf offensive. “They overuse the passive voice, then they have a lot of rhetorical questions. It’s banal.”

He advised students to use study guides as additional material to the books. “Nothing can substitute for the original text,” he said.

Professor Fisher also had advice for teachers. “I make my students submit their papers through turnitin.com,” which is a plagiarism search engine. He says it is very effective at forcing students to offer some original writing, if not some original thought.